links stink ( i think?)

hi.  i decided to not publish my del.ici.ous links as posts anymore, because:

a) it made me look really really lazy, and it made it really evident that I was like, not writing anything for a week.  which is true, but I felt like people thought I was a slacker.

b) i catalog a lot of links that are ridiculous, and really of no use to anyone but myself, unless you happen to a person who is interested in squid knitting patterns, interior design, Olivier Theyskens, cute animal videos, and James McAvoy*   ( although Charles does like them, apparently )

c) i thought if i took them away, it would make me write more.

If you do like the randomness of my del.ici.ous links, they're on the sidebar of the blog, or you can subscribe to them in del.ici.ous, i guess.   and if you don't, then I can't be responsible for the Olsen-twin related news that you'll be missing, or the stuff on Etsy that you won't get to not buy because I already bought it.


* god. who ISN'T interested in that stuff? i should have picked better examples of uselessness.  I mean, who can't use cute animal videos?  or James McAvoy?    

Comments

[Stan Lee]

Good to have you back Amber

[nicole Lloyd]

This makes me happy, I've got to admit I wasn't coming to your site as much. Part of me reading your site is because I get the opportunity to step in to your brain, see how Amber thinks. When it's just links it's not nearly as exciting. Thow the the links were usually pretty cool. But they don't resinate as long as your words. The last post on dying proffesions was interesting, I'll be thinking about that all day today.